Paul again boasts, "All things are lawful for me." (I-Cor. 6:12) So all his boasts of Judaism come to nothing, since he no longer is under the Law.

The Sacramental Union with Jesus puts Christians above the Law, just as the pagan mysteries obtained salvation with no moral obligation, by communion with their god.

This is just what Pauline Theology comes to in what it has done for so-called Christianity.

The Apostles' Assembly of the Essene-Nazarenes formerly confined to the Jordan, moved into Jerusalem in order to curb the contemporary hypocrisy and fallacy being preached by the orthodox Jewish doctrines.

But the Epistles of Paul were written to controvert the seemingly exclusiveness of the Nazarite Essenes of possessing a risen or resurrected Savior, experienced only by their initiated seers or prophets known as the Elect.

The visions and preaching of Paul were soon condemned and warned against thru-out the Mediterranean world known to be colonized by Essene followers.

Paul claims to be an "apostle" for the Gentiles, but wherever he goes he seeks sympathy with the Jews with his heresies against their doctrines simply because he was born a Jew, but no longer even lived in their doctrines, and much less in the teachings of James, Peter and John in their Essene holiness.

Their words had to be authenticated, showing that Jesus Christ had come in the flesh by experience.

Jesus of Nazareth came to Paul rebuking him in the form of a light from the sky that shone about him, and a voice that accused him of persecution.

Paul's Jesus was not in the flesh doing God's will, but rather for doing the opposite.

Thus, the Jesus of Paul was that of judgement showing him to be the Anti-Christ of New Testament scriptures.

John came out frankly in his Epistles by condemning such liars who do not keep the commandments, saying everything is lawful for me.

Jesus has come in the flesh only to those who really live sinless, impeccable lives knowing Him in the flesh.
 

PAUL PREFERS DEVIL WORSHIP

Certain Pharisees had insisted that Gentile converts had to be circumcised surgically, a cause that Paul presented to the head Apostles in Jerusalem.

The upshot of this question was that those who taught the requirement of circumcision were contradicted,

they said "on these things we have never commanded them" Acts (15:24),

and finally, "For it is the will of the Holy Spirit and of us, to lay upon you no additional burden than

THESE NECESSARY THINGS: THAT YOU ABSTAIN FROM IMMOLATING ANIMALS, BOTH FROM BLEEDING THEM AND FROM STRANGLING THEM,

AND FROM FORNICATION: when you keep yourselves from these things, you do well. Remain steadfast in our Lord."

So how does this compare with Paul's teaching: "Anything for sale in the shambles, that eat without question for conscience sake: For the earth is the Lord's and the fullness thereof.

If any pagan invite you and you wish to go, whatever is set before you eat, without question for conscience sake." (I-Cor.10:25-27)

The Christ of Paul is neither an Essene, nor a Pharisee, but a Pagan spirit! As he himself says: "You cannot be partakers of the table of our Lord and of the table of devils." He prefers devil worship!

DECLARING ALL FOODS CLEAN WAS AN INTERPOLATION

Then, in Galatians 2:14 Paul says, "If you being a Jew, live after the manner of the Gentiles and not as do the Jews, why do you compel the Gentile converts to live as do the Jews?"

This may be no more than in the case of the disciples eating without washing their hands in Mark 7, so Jesus says what enters a man cannot defile a man, but what comes out of him.

So the Bible-correctors took the opportunity to add, "Thus he declared all foods clean," to match Paul's preaching of flesh-eating, which was never in the Eastern Peshitta text, nor ancient gospel manuscripts.

+++

As to bathing, fasting to heal the body and mind, sleep, meaningful exercise, sunshine, etc. again we have simple formulas of prayer in ceremonies instead of true natural living.

Vicarious Atonement 

Go and learn what this means: “For I desire mercy and not sacrifice.”  Matthew 9:13

      
NO CRUCIFIED JESUS WAS USED UNTIL THE 8TH CENTURY

Thus, the Roman Church gained acceptance in the fourth century without any picturing of a man crucified for anthropomorphistic worship of a dead god who awoke from his drunken stupor the third day.

The Greek word Ixthus is an anagram for Jesus Xristus Theou Uios Soter, or Jesus Christ, God’s Son, Savior. Jesus is thus a “Fish”,-Ixthus!
 

It was not until the Council of Constantinople in 707 that the picture of Jesus Christ was ordered to be drawn in the form of a man: in place of a figure of the lamb, used at that time, there was to be a figure of a man nailed to a cross.

In Christian art the earliest instance of the crucifixion of Jesus Christ thus appeared only in the eighth and ninth centuries, according to Mrs. Jameson in her “History of our Lord in Art”.

The same affirms, the figures are with the body upright, arms extended straight with no nails, no wounds, no crown of thorns, frequently clothed with a regal crown, a God, young and beautiful.

There was no compulsion or pain shown, since the doctrine of vicarious atonement of Jesus met with no success with the Jews, for they regarded a man that was crucified as a great curse. (Deut.21:23)

Thus, it proves Christianity from the beginning made its inroads into the Roman Empire and eventually the whole world thru the beauty of the Sermon on the Mount, John's mystical theology and the bloodless sacrifice of Jesus Christ incarnate in the Holy Communion of Christians.

passages from The Buddhist Essene Gospel of Jesus

Note: The bloodless sacrifice is the daily Communion eating living vegetarian foods: fruits and vegetables and kindly raised, cultured dairy products, without the presence of bloody meats (the paleo or omnivorous diet) nor seeds, beans, sprouted seeds, nuts and grains (the vegan diet) nor fruit only or fruit and herbs (the fruitarian diet).